Corporate communications specialists would recognize a lot in the tactics and strategies of old line Communist apparatchiks.
Fidel Castro, Ken Lay, Bernard Ebbers, Roger Smith, Yuri Andropov - who doesn’t remember the stonewalling, the suspicion and the sense of entitlement that seeped through their public words and actions?
When threatened, they would respond with indignation and counter-accusations.
Pity poor Fidel. He’s finally gotten so sick he can’t manipulate the tendrils of power and propaganda anymore. Even he (or his nurse) has recognized that the glorious facade has faded, and people were doubtful he would ever reappear in public.
Another Communist lion fades into the brush.
That leaves the Chinese, the Vietnamese and the North Koreans. And a gaggle of former Soviets.
Not a whole lot of effervescent personalities in that bunch.
What has happened to all the old Communist apparatchiks? Gray suits, gray hair, a posse of similarly gray doppelgangers, all piling out of four door sedans to appear at a Worker’s Rally or May Day parade.
A real cottage industry had developed around interpreting the symbolism of their spoken and written word: what did that headline in Pravda really mean? If the Second Assistant Prime Minister delivered a speech live on prime time television, did that mean his career was on the upswing?
These kremlinologists were our guides through the thicket of jargon, gestures and grimaces in search of political, economic and social insight.
I seem to remember watching former Soviet leader Yuri Andropov looking sickly and weak at a May Day parade - the resulting speculation about his tenure as leader was confirmed when he died within a year.
What’s the modern equivalent? A financial analyst? In many ways, their professional value is built from the implied ability to read the movements and twitches of the market.
There’s been discussion this week of a gentleman who’s built a habit of inflitrating quarterly earnings conference calls, simply to ask semi-literate questions about Six Sigma and process re-engineering.
Financial analysts are genuinely puzzled by his behaviour: it isn’t overly disruptive, and doesn’t appear to be prompted by malice.
If we lived in a more suspicious time - and if his interventions were more inventive - we might suspect this mystery caller of disinformation or economic espionage.
Instead, we’re simply wondering out loud why anyone would want to play in the dry world of financial communications.
Still, it’s notable that some analysts are disturbed that someone is toying with their conventions, processes and playground.
Difference is, this guy won’t get grabbed off the street, bundled in the trunk of a four door sedan, and get buried under the Louisiana Superdome.
Technorati Tags: kremlinologist, financial analyst, corporate communications