Comments on: By viral, I mean poisonous http://canuckflack.com/2007/11/23/by-viral-i-mean-poisonous/ ... it's about public relations, marketing, retail quirks, government communications and oddities ... and written in Canada! Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:22:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Colin http://canuckflack.com/2007/11/23/by-viral-i-mean-poisonous/comment-page-1/#comment-42807 Colin Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:20:15 +0000 http://canuckflack.com/2007/11/23/by-viral-i-mean-poisonous/#comment-42807 Hey Tut. Thanks for dropping by. I hope you don't mind, but I deleted your URL from the comment. Not because there's a swear word in your domain name (I really couldn't care about that) but because you spelled "Nazi" with a "t" on your blog. I thought hard-core coders dropped out of college, not Grade 9 history. Hey Tut. Thanks for dropping by.

I hope you don’t mind, but I deleted your URL from the comment. Not because there’s a swear word in your domain name (I really couldn’t care about that) but because you spelled “Nazi” with a “t” on your blog.

I thought hard-core coders dropped out of college, not Grade 9 history.

]]> By: King Tut http://canuckflack.com/2007/11/23/by-viral-i-mean-poisonous/comment-page-1/#comment-42806 King Tut Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:27:18 +0000 http://canuckflack.com/2007/11/23/by-viral-i-mean-poisonous/#comment-42806 <p>...and you're in marketing? teeheee..."magic"...lol...Santa Claus isn't real... </p> …and you’re in marketing? teeheee…”magic”…lol…Santa Claus isn’t real…

]]> By: Wildfire Strategic Marketing | (3i) » The great viral swindle? http://canuckflack.com/2007/11/23/by-viral-i-mean-poisonous/comment-page-1/#comment-42787 Wildfire Strategic Marketing | (3i) » The great viral swindle? Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:48:38 +0000 http://canuckflack.com/2007/11/23/by-viral-i-mean-poisonous/#comment-42787 [...] I was hesitant to weigh in on the latest kerfuffle raised by the recent TechCrunch post, frankly, because I knew all of these black hat tactics were being utilized by those less savory in our field, and the post just confirmed it, but felt I had to do so when I realized that too many people in our industry were surprised (vs. the ‘regular folks’ in the TC comments who were justifiably outraged, if not surprised). [...] [...] I was hesitant to weigh in on the latest kerfuffle raised by the recent TechCrunch post, frankly, because I knew all of these black hat tactics were being utilized by those less savory in our field, and the post just confirmed it, but felt I had to do so when I realized that too many people in our industry were surprised (vs. the ‘regular folks’ in the TC comments who were justifiably outraged, if not surprised). [...]

]]>