<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A strategic approach to government and corporate blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canuckflack.com/2007/09/26/a-strategic-approach-to-government-and-corporate-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/09/26/a-strategic-approach-to-government-and-corporate-blogging/</link>
	<description>... it's about public relations, marketing, retail quirks, government communications and oddities ... and written in Canada!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Governments get the Blog &#171; Public Relations Rogue</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/09/26/a-strategic-approach-to-government-and-corporate-blogging/#comment-42183</link>
		<dc:creator>Governments get the Blog &#171; Public Relations Rogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/09/26/a-strategic-approach-to-government-and-corporate-blogging/#comment-42183</guid>
		<description>[...] Thursday, September 27th, 2007 in Blogs, Corporations, Web 2.0   My fellow Canadian at Canuckflack recently had a post about the Foreign Office in the UK government opening its doors - quite wide - to external blogging. I&#8217;d also read recently that some enlightened departments in the Canadian government were also blogging. And I&#8217;m sure there are more in other parts of the world. I give these guys kudos, but I wonder what this says about corporations that are afraid to dip their toe into the big conversation. If a government department can do it - those bastions of bureaucracy, secrecy and caution - why not companies? For the UK blog it appears the format will allow a wide range of people to blog - not just a moderator or restricted group. I think this approach makes sense, with the following caveats: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thursday, September 27th, 2007 in Blogs, Corporations, Web 2.0   My fellow Canadian at Canuckflack recently had a post about the Foreign Office in the UK government opening its doors - quite wide - to external blogging. I&#8217;d also read recently that some enlightened departments in the Canadian government were also blogging. And I&#8217;m sure there are more in other parts of the world. I give these guys kudos, but I wonder what this says about corporations that are afraid to dip their toe into the big conversation. If a government department can do it - those bastions of bureaucracy, secrecy and caution - why not companies? For the UK blog it appears the format will allow a wide range of people to blog - not just a moderator or restricted group. I think this approach makes sense, with the following caveats: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
