<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edelman picks some restrictive places to make its point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/</link>
	<description>... it's about public relations, marketing, retail quirks, government communications and oddities ... and written in Canada!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/comment-page-1/#comment-31617</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/#comment-31617</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by, Phil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by, Phil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR Blog News &#187; Edelman Speaks Up &#8230; Say What???</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/comment-page-1/#comment-31616</link>
		<dc:creator>PR Blog News &#187; Edelman Speaks Up &#8230; Say What???</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/#comment-31616</guid>
		<description>[...] Okay, Richard Edelman won’t talk about Microsoft of Wal-Mart, but maybe he will discuss his personal blogging standards and policies. I posted to his blog last week and it still has not appeared. Others have been complaining recently that their posts, when they ask questions about Edelman blogging policies, take several days to appear and then they are ignored. Anyone who manages a blog knows you can approve or disallow a post in seconds.  "[...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Okay, Richard Edelman won’t talk about Microsoft of Wal-Mart, but maybe he will discuss his personal blogging standards and policies. I posted to his blog last week and it still has not appeared. Others have been complaining recently that their posts, when they ask questions about Edelman blogging policies, take several days to appear and then they are ignored. Anyone who manages a blog knows you can approve or disallow a post in seconds.  &#8221;[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rose</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/comment-page-1/#comment-31615</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/#comment-31615</guid>
		<description>Richard Edelman's post on his blog about this is very disappointing. It's like he needs some outside PR counsel to wake him up.  You can't have a highly visible public blog that trumpets ethics and transparency "in the industry" and then duck the issues when they apply to you. He's missing a great opportunity to engage the industry in dialogue and he's prolonging the questions about Edelman's opennness and ethical standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Edelman&#8217;s post on his blog about this is very disappointing. It&#8217;s like he needs some outside PR counsel to wake him up.  You can&#8217;t have a highly visible public blog that trumpets ethics and transparency &#8220;in the industry&#8221; and then duck the issues when they apply to you. He&#8217;s missing a great opportunity to engage the industry in dialogue and he&#8217;s prolonging the questions about Edelman&#8217;s opennness and ethical standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Gomes, Edelman</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/comment-page-1/#comment-31613</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Gomes, Edelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/#comment-31613</guid>
		<description>Ummm... No one guests on my blog, David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230; No one guests on my blog, David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murphy&#8217;s Law &#187; Slow down you blog too fast.. and other blog PR stuff</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/comment-page-1/#comment-31585</link>
		<dc:creator>Murphy&#8217;s Law &#187; Slow down you blog too fast.. and other blog PR stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/#comment-31585</guid>
		<description>[...] Finally, Richard Edelman comments on the recent laptop furore - I&#8217;ll say no more  - and Colin McKay has some feedback for him [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Finally, Richard Edelman comments on the recent laptop furore - I&#8217;ll say no more  - and Colin McKay has some feedback for him [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/comment-page-1/#comment-31558</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/#comment-31558</guid>
		<description>For reference's sake, Keith O'Brien has commented on the strategy as well:

http://www.ubiquitousmarketing.com/index.php/2007/01/14/does-narrow-matter/#comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For reference&#8217;s sake, Keith O&#8217;Brien has commented on the strategy as well:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ubiquitousmarketing.com/index.php/2007/01/14/does-narrow-matter/#comments" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.ubiquitousmarketing.com');">http://www.ubiquitousmarketing.com/index.php/2007/01/14/does-narrow-matter/#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/comment-page-1/#comment-31555</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/#comment-31555</guid>
		<description>It makes total sense that those closest to the issue should be the ones responding.  So, why not give those without blogs the opportunity to guest author on Richard's, Steve's, Phil's...or all Edelman blogs to ensure there side gets through?

As much as I applaud Edelman's leadership in this space from their corporate and client-marketing points-of-view (and their willingness to make mistakes), I wonder about their lack of creativity in dealing with issues that erupt online.  Doctor, heal thyself.

Even though I work at one of their competitors (Fleishman-Hillard), I want these guys to succeed for the good of the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes total sense that those closest to the issue should be the ones responding.  So, why not give those without blogs the opportunity to guest author on Richard&#8217;s, Steve&#8217;s, Phil&#8217;s&#8230;or all Edelman blogs to ensure there side gets through?</p>
<p>As much as I applaud Edelman&#8217;s leadership in this space from their corporate and client-marketing points-of-view (and their willingness to make mistakes), I wonder about their lack of creativity in dealing with issues that erupt online.  Doctor, heal thyself.</p>
<p>Even though I work at one of their competitors (Fleishman-Hillard), I want these guys to succeed for the good of the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McEnany</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/comment-page-1/#comment-31544</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McEnany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/#comment-31544</guid>
		<description>I think it's about time for Edelman to stop pretending to be some champion for the blogosphere. Seriously, how can one company repeatedly make so many mistakes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s about time for Edelman to stop pretending to be some champion for the blogosphere. Seriously, how can one company repeatedly make so many mistakes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Engagement</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/comment-page-1/#comment-31516</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Engagement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2007/01/13/edelman-picks-some-restrictive-places-to-make-its-point/#comment-31516</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Does Edelman get it?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Canuckflack / Edelman picks some restrictive places to make its point. Whaa? Wait. The head of your online practice thought the best place to respond to criticism about a blogger outreach program was … IN PRINT? IN A TRADE MAGAZINE? Not all the criti...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Does Edelman get it?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Canuckflack / Edelman picks some restrictive places to make its point. Whaa? Wait. The head of your online practice thought the best place to respond to criticism about a blogger outreach program was … IN PRINT? IN A TRADE MAGAZINE? Not all the criti&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
