<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government communications doesn&#8217;t suck. I mean it.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/</link>
	<description>... it's about public relations, marketing, retail quirks, government communications and oddities ... and written in Canada!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SoSaidThe.Organization &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Government Communications is interesting, dammit!</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/comment-page-1/#comment-34789</link>
		<dc:creator>SoSaidThe.Organization &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Government Communications is interesting, dammit!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/#comment-34789</guid>
		<description>[...] Following up on my previous post -Â  Government communications doesn&#8217;t suck, I mean it - I&#8217;d like to discuss the wide range of subjects and topics that could draw your attention as a government communicator. After all, government work doesnâ€™t mean professional or personal stagnation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Following up on my previous post -Â  Government communications doesn&#8217;t suck, I mean it - I&#8217;d like to discuss the wide range of subjects and topics that could draw your attention as a government communicator. After all, government work doesnâ€™t mean professional or personal stagnation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ketcheson.net :: Working in Government Communications</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/comment-page-1/#comment-14113</link>
		<dc:creator>Ketcheson.net :: Working in Government Communications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/#comment-14113</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been remiss in my duties as someone blogging in the space of government communications issues for not pointing to aÂ  series of good posts from fellow government communicator Colin McKay around the benefits of working inside government. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been remiss in my duties as someone blogging in the space of government communications issues for not pointing to aÂ  series of good posts from fellow government communicator Colin McKay around the benefits of working inside government. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inside PR: a public relations podcast - Inside PR #28 - Wednesday, October 11, 2006</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/comment-page-1/#comment-12538</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside PR: a public relations podcast - Inside PR #28 - Wednesday, October 11, 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/#comment-12538</guid>
		<description>[...] 10:50 Terry starts this week&#8217;s topic by reading Colin McKay&#8217;s comment on last week&#8217;s show. Colin talks about &#8220;government&#8221; and &#8220;not-for-profit&#8221; areas of PR in the &#8220;agency vs. client side&#8221; debate. On his blog, he makes the case for working on the government side of PR. Terry spends a few minutes talking about the advantages of working for government. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10:50 Terry starts this week&#8217;s topic by reading Colin McKay&#8217;s comment on last week&#8217;s show. Colin talks about &#8220;government&#8221; and &#8220;not-for-profit&#8221; areas of PR in the &#8220;agency vs. client side&#8221; debate. On his blog, he makes the case for working on the government side of PR. Terry spends a few minutes talking about the advantages of working for government. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Fallis</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/comment-page-1/#comment-12363</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Fallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/#comment-12363</guid>
		<description>Great post Colin.  I completely agree.  As someone who used to work in government, albeit on political staff, I should not have overlooked government as great place to learn.  When you listen to IPR #28 I hope you think we've corrected the oversight.  Thanks for bringing it forward...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Colin.  I completely agree.  As someone who used to work in government, albeit on political staff, I should not have overlooked government as great place to learn.  When you listen to IPR #28 I hope you think we&#8217;ve corrected the oversight.  Thanks for bringing it forward&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/comment-page-1/#comment-12280</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/#comment-12280</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the fact that you're fighting the uphill battle on this one. It's true that the govt offers an upside - and you've hit on that - but your comments on the manager's attire get to a difficult truth: there are alot of wasters that will be your colleagues. The presence of the unmotivated and distinterested (and, yes, unstylish) can really wear on anyone with even a miniscule amount of ambition. The temptation to saw a good percentage off one's salary and get an agency gig is ever-present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the fact that you&#8217;re fighting the uphill battle on this one. It&#8217;s true that the govt offers an upside - and you&#8217;ve hit on that - but your comments on the manager&#8217;s attire get to a difficult truth: there are alot of wasters that will be your colleagues. The presence of the unmotivated and distinterested (and, yes, unstylish) can really wear on anyone with even a miniscule amount of ambition. The temptation to saw a good percentage off one&#8217;s salary and get an agency gig is ever-present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/comment-page-1/#comment-11527</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canuckflack.com/2006/10/07/government-communications-doesnt-suck-i-mean-it/#comment-11527</guid>
		<description>All great points.  And clearly we didn't give the government communications stream enough (if any) love on Inside PR 27.  

We'll fix that in the future...please don't send Rev Can to the palatial towers of the Inside PR podcasting empire!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All great points.  And clearly we didn&#8217;t give the government communications stream enough (if any) love on Inside PR 27.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll fix that in the future&#8230;please don&#8217;t send Rev Can to the palatial towers of the Inside PR podcasting empire!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
